In a nutshell

  • Wealth, or net worth, is what you own minus what you owe: a home, a pension, savings, investments and possessions. It is different from income, which is what you are paid.
  • In Great Britain, the wealthiest 1% of households hold as much as the least wealthy half put together. [1] The share held by those at the top has been broadly stable since the 1980s. But wealth as a whole has grown much faster than pay, so the gap in pounds between the top and the middle has widened, to around £1.3 million per adult. [2]
  • It matters because wealth is both a safety net and a head start, and it is getting harder to build from earnings alone. That gap is equal to 52 years of typical full-time pay. [3] For people born in the 1980s, how much they inherit is projected to depend heavily on how wealthy their parents are. [4]

The basics

The main official source is a survey of households in Great Britain. Its latest results cover April 2020 to March 2022, so figures on this page are for Great Britain and that period unless stated. [1]

The survey counts four kinds of wealth. These are their shares of the total. [1]

Property: 40%

The value of homes and other property, minus any mortgage.

Private pensions: 35%

The value of workplace and personal pensions built up so far. The state pension is not counted.

Savings and investments: 14%

Money in the bank, shares and other investments, minus debts such as loans and credit cards.

Possessions: 10%

Vehicles, household contents and valuables.

Wealth is not income

Someone can have a high income and little wealth, like a well-paid young renter. Someone else can have a low income and a lot of wealth, like a pensioner who owns a valuable house. The two overlap, but wealth inequality is much greater than income inequality.

Shares and gaps: two ways to measure

A share is the slice of all wealth held by a group, such as the top 10%. A gap is the difference in pounds between one group and another. If everyone's wealth doubles, the shares stay the same but the gaps double.

Both things have happened in Britain. Shares have been broadly stable and the gaps have grown. [2] Much of the argument about wealth comes down to which of the two you think matters more.

How big is the problem?

No single number captures it, so it helps to look at several.

The top 1% and the bottom half

The wealthiest 1% of households held 10% of all household wealth. That was the same as the least wealthy 50% of households combined. [1]

The wealthiest tenth held 41%. [5]

What it takes to be at the top

To be in the wealthiest 10%, a household needed £1,200,500 or more, pensions included. For the top 1% it was £3,121,500.

The household in the middle had £293,700. The least wealthy tenth had £16,500 or less. [1]

More unequal than income

Statisticians use the Gini coefficient to score inequality from 0 (everyone has the same) to 1 (complete inequality). Wealth scores 0.59. Income after direct taxes scores 0.36. Savings and investments are the most unevenly spread kind of wealth, at 0.87. [1]

The gap in pounds has grown

The gap in average wealth per adult between families in the top tenth and families in the middle was £1.3 million in 2020–22. In 2006–08 it was £1.0 million in real terms. [2]

That is 52 years of typical full-time earnings, up from 38. [3]

Many have little to fall back on

The household in the middle had £10,400 in savings and investments after debts. For households that rent it was £900. For households whose head was neither working nor retired it was £300. [1]

The very top is hard to see

Surveys struggle to reach the richest households. A 2021 study that added data from the Sunday Times Rich List estimated that nearly £800 billion held by the very wealthiest was missing from the official figures. [6]

The 2026 Rich List counted 157 billionaires in the UK. [7]

Not every measure points the same way

  • The top's share has not been rising. The share of wealth held by the richest tenth of households has been broadly stable since the 1980s. [2] Estimates of that share run from 41% to around half, depending on how wealth is counted. [5] [2] Researchers who corrected for wealth missing at the top put it at around 47%, and also found it flat over time. [8]
  • A century ago, wealth was far more concentrated. Before the First World War the wealthiest 1% of people in the UK held around 70% of personal wealth. That share fell dramatically between 1914 and 1979. The fall ended around 1980, and there is some evidence of a rise since. [9]
  • Age explains part of the picture. People build up a pension and pay off a mortgage over a working life. Household wealth peaks when the head of the household is aged 65 to 74, then falls as pensions are drawn. [1]
  • Most wealth is homes and pensions. Together they make up three-quarters of the total. Even for the wealthiest tenth, property and pensions are about three-quarters of what they hold. [1]
  • Wealth has fallen since 2021. The Resolution Foundation estimates that household wealth fell by more than £2 trillion as interest rates rose, and that the gaps narrowed. [10] The official survey stops before this happened.

A caution about the numbers. The official results are more than four years old and were collected during the pandemic. In June 2025 the survey's status as accredited official statistics was suspended while the Office for National Statistics works to improve its quality. [1]

Example

Hannah and Joe are both 35. They trained as teachers together, work at the same school and earn the same salary.

  • Hannah's parents helped her with a deposit when she was 27. Her flat has risen in value since, her mortgage costs less than renting would, and she expects one day to inherit a share of her parents' house.
  • Joe's parents rent their home and had nothing spare to give. He has rented since university. He saves what he can, but house prices have moved faster than his deposit.

Neither has done anything wrong, and neither works harder than the other. But Hannah has tens of thousands of pounds in her home and Joe has a few thousand in the bank. The difference isn't what they earn. It's what they started with.

How did we get here?

There is no single cause. These are the explanations that come up most often.

  1. Wealth grew much faster than the economy

    What happened

    In the mid-1980s, total household wealth was around three times the size of the UK economy. [2] By 2019 it was around seven times. [10]

    Why it matters

    When wealth is large compared with pay, the same shares mean bigger gaps in pounds. It takes more years of earnings to catch up, so saving from a salary counts for less and what you already own counts for more.

    What the evidence shows

    The gap between the top tenth and the middle was worth 38 years of typical full-time earnings in 2006–08. [2] By 2020–22 it was 52 years. [3]

  2. Most of the growth came from rising prices, not saving

    What happened

    Homes, shares and pension funds rose in value over several decades. A Bank of England staff paper found that the rise in house prices relative to incomes between 1985 and 2018 could be more than accounted for by the long decline in real interest rates (interest rates after inflation). [11] From 2009 the Bank's bond-buying programme, known as quantitative easing, pushed asset prices up further. [12]

    Why it matters

    When prices rise, the gains go to people who already own assets, in proportion to how much they own. People who own nothing gain nothing.

    What the evidence shows

    The Resolution Foundation estimates that rising asset prices, not new saving, accounted for 60% of the rise in average family wealth between 2018–20 and 2020–22 [2], and for 53% of the rise since the start of the 2010s. [3]

    The Bank of England said in 2012 that the top 5% of households held 40% of the financial assets, outside pensions, whose value its programme had boosted. It also judged that without the programme most people in the UK would have been worse off, because the economy would have been weaker. [12]

  3. Owning a home became the dividing line

    What happened

    Property is the largest part of household wealth. Older households who own may have benefited from rising house prices over their lifetime, while only 5% of renters have any property wealth at all. [1]

    Why it matters

    A mortgage turns monthly housing costs into an asset. Rent does not. So two households with the same income can end up with very different wealth.

    What the evidence shows

    The typical household that owned its home outright had wealth of £647,400. For those with a mortgage it was £404,700. For those who rented it was £40,800. [1]

  4. Inheritances are growing

    What happened

    Inheritances have been growing as a share of national income in the UK since the 1970s. [4] As older generations' wealth has grown, so has the amount they can pass on.

    Why it matters

    An inheritance depends on who your parents are, not on what you do. The more it counts for, the more a person's prospects are shaped by the family they were born into.

    What the evidence shows

    For people born in the 1980s, the Institute for Fiscal Studies projects that inheritances will add 29% to lifetime income for those whose parents are in the wealthiest fifth, and 5% for those whose parents are in the least wealthy fifth. [4] A fifth are expected to inherit less than £10,000, and a quarter more than £280,000. [13]

    One complication: measured against their own lifetime income, high and low earners are projected to inherit similar proportions, around 16% and 15%. [4] So inheritance divides people more by family background than by earnings.

  5. The gap between young and old widened

    What happened

    Between the 2008 financial crisis and the pandemic, the wealth gap between younger and older people widened. [10] In 2020–22 the typical household headed by someone aged 65 to 74 had £502,500. That was 33 times as much as one headed by someone aged 16 to 24. [1]

    Why it matters

    Some of this is normal. Older people have had longer to save. The worry is whether today's young adults will catch up when they reach the same age.

    What the evidence shows

    The Institute for Fiscal Studies found that people born in the 1980s had built up no more wealth than those born a decade earlier had at the same age, even though their parents were wealthier. [13]

    The fall in wealth since 2021 has narrowed the gap between young and old. But a lot of wealth remains with older households, and will pass down through inheritances and gifts. [10]

Who is affected most?

These are the groups with the least wealth. Figures are medians, meaning the household in the middle of each group.

Renters

Households that rent had typical wealth of £40,800, against £647,400 for those who own outright. Their typical savings, after debts, were £900. [1]

Younger adults

Households headed by someone aged 16 to 24 had typical wealth of £15,200. Those headed by someone aged 25 to 34 had typical savings, after debts, of £1,300. [1]

People out of work before retirement

Where the head of the household was neither working nor retired, for example through illness, caring or unemployment, typical wealth was £25,200. [1]

Lower-wealth regions

Typical household wealth in the North East was £179,900. In the South East it was £489,800, more than twice as much. [1]

Some ethnic minority groups

Households headed by someone of white ethnicity were four times as likely to have wealth above £500,000 as households headed by someone of black African ethnicity, according to researchers using the official survey. [8]

People whose parents have little

A fifth of people born in the 1980s are expected to inherit less than £10,000. A quarter are expected to inherit more than £280,000. [13]

Why is it hard to fix?

Few people argue that wealth should be spread equally. The harder questions are how much wealth concentration is too much, and what could be done without harming people who have simply saved for a home and a pension.

  1. We can't see the top clearly

    The problem

    The official survey can under-represent the wealthiest households, and its estimates for the top 1% are uncertain. [1] One study put the missing wealth at nearly £800 billion. [6] The latest results are also dated, and the survey has lost its accredited status for now. [1]

    A possible fix

    Combine the survey with other evidence, as researchers have done with the Sunday Times Rich List. [6] The Office for National Statistics says it is developing a plan to bring its wealth statistics back to the standard needed. [1]

  2. Most wealth is ordinary homes and pensions

    The problem

    Property and pensions make up three-quarters of household wealth on the official measure [1], and 80% on the Resolution Foundation's. The Foundation warns that higher taxes on wealth would be likely to fall on pensioners and homeowners in the south of England, or their families, and not only on the super-rich. [3]

    A possible fix

    There are two different routes. One is to focus only on the very largest fortunes, which is the idea behind an Extreme Wealth Line. The other is to help people with few assets to build some, mainly through home ownership and pension saving.

  3. Asset prices follow interest rates

    The problem

    Much of the growth in wealth came from asset prices rising as interest rates fell. [11] The Bank of England sets interest rates to control inflation, not to manage who owns what. Its own assessment is that its bond-buying raised asset prices, but that most people would have been worse off without it. [12]

    A possible fix

    Leave interest rates to do their job, and deal with the effects on wealth through other policies such as tax. Higher interest rates since 2021 have already reversed part of the rise. [10]

  4. Passing wealth on is something most families want

    The problem

    Most parents want to help their children, and inheritances are projected to grow. [4] But the more they count for, the more they favour people whose parents are wealthy.

    A possible fix

    This is mainly a question of how inheritances and gifts are taxed, which the tax page covers. The Institute for Fiscal Studies adds a caution: bigger inheritances do not by themselves tell us whether inheritance is making inequality worse. That depends on who receives them, and when. [13]

Where people disagree

The figures above are mostly agreed. What they add up to is not.

It's a serious problem

  • The wealthiest 1% of households hold as much as the least wealthy half combined. [1]
  • The gap between the top tenth and the middle has grown to £1.3 million per adult [2], equal to 52 years of typical full-time earnings. [3]
  • Most of the recent rise in wealth came from rising asset prices, not saving: 60% between 2018–20 and 2020–22. [2] People with no assets gain nothing from that.
  • For people born in the 1980s, inheritances are projected to add 29% to lifetime income for those with the wealthiest parents, and 5% for those with the least wealthy. [4]
  • The official figures understate the top. Researchers estimate that nearly £800 billion is missing, and found that inequality rose slightly in the decade after the financial crisis. [6]

It's overstated, or has other causes

  • The share of wealth held by the richest tenth has been broadly stable since the 1980s. [2] Before the First World War, the top 1% alone held around 70%. [9]
  • Even after correcting for wealth missing at the top, researchers found the top tenth's share was flat over time. [8]
  • Three-quarters of household wealth is homes and pensions, built up over a working life. Wealth peaks at ages 65 to 74 and then falls as pensions are drawn. [1]
  • Household wealth is estimated to have fallen by more than £2 trillion since 2021 as interest rates rose, and the gaps have narrowed. [10]
  • The Bank of England's bond-buying raised asset prices, but its assessment is that most people would have been worse off without it. [12]

On balance

Wealth in Britain is very unevenly spread, far more so than income. The wealthiest 1% of households hold as much as the least wealthy half.

But the title of this page needs care. On the best available data, the share held by those at the top has been broadly stable since the 1980s, and is far lower than it was a century ago. What has changed is the size of the pile. Wealth has grown much faster than pay, so the gaps in pounds are wider, harder to cross by working and saving, and more dependent on inheritance.

The real disagreement is about how much of this reflects ordinary saving for a home and a pension, and how much it matters when the gaps grow but the shares don't. It is also about what we can't see: the official figures are dated and miss wealth at the very top. For one option, see Exploring an Extreme Wealth Line.

Sources and further reading

These sources support the facts and examples on this page. They explain the evidence, but they don't all share the same view of how serious the problem is or what should be done about it.

  1. Office for National Statistics: Household total wealth in Great Britain: April 2020 to March 2022 (2025) — how much households own, what it is made up of, and how it varies by wealth group, age, tenure, work status and region. Collected during the pandemic; accredited status suspended in June 2025.
  2. Resolution Foundation: Before the fall – the distribution of household wealth in Britain and the impact on families (2025) — the long-run growth of wealth, the stability of shares, the widening gap in pounds, and how much of the rise came from asset prices.
  3. Resolution Foundation: Britain's huge wealth gaps mean a typical worker would need to save more than a lifetime's worth of their earnings to become wealthy (2025) — the gap expressed in years of typical earnings, asset-price gains since the 2010s, and the warning about who higher wealth taxes would fall on.
  4. Institute for Fiscal Studies: Inheritances and inequality over the life cycle – report summary (2021) — the growth of inheritances since the 1970s and projections of how much they will add to lifetime income, by parental wealth and by earnings.
  5. Office for National Statistics: Privately owned wealth in the UK – freedom of information response (2025) — the shares of household wealth held by the wealthiest 1%, 10% and 50% of households.
  6. Advani, Bangham and Leslie: The UK's wealth distribution and characteristics of high-wealth households, CAGE working paper 576 (2021) — the wealth missing from the official survey at the very top, estimated using the Sunday Times Rich List.
  7. Express & Star (Press Association): Rich List 2026 – who are the wealthiest people in the UK? (2026) — the number of UK billionaires counted by the Sunday Times Rich List in 2026.
  8. CAGE, University of Warwick: Official statistics underestimate wealth inequality (2022) — the share of the wealthiest tenth after correcting for missing wealth, and differences in wealth between ethnic groups.
  9. Alvaredo, Atkinson and Morelli: Top wealth shares in the UK over more than a century (2018) — the share of personal wealth held by the wealthiest 1% from 1895, its fall between 1914 and 1979, and what has happened since.
  10. Resolution Foundation: Inequality control – why wealth inequality has not increased while asset prices have soared and what that means for the future (2024) — why shares stayed stable while wealth grew, the gap between young and old, and the fall in wealth since 2021.
  11. Bank of England: Staff Working Paper No. 837 – UK house prices and three decades of decline in the risk-free real interest rate (2019) — the part played by falling real interest rates in the rise of house prices. Sets out its authors' views, not necessarily the Bank's.
  12. Bank of England: The distributional effects of asset purchases (2012) — how its bond-buying programme affected asset prices, who holds those assets, and its judgement of the overall effect.
  13. Institute for Fiscal Studies: Inheritances and inequality within generations (2020) — how much people born in the 1980s are expected to inherit, how their wealth compares with earlier generations, and the limits of what inheritance figures show.
Preview

Keep in the loop

News

Highlights from about the UK economy, the UK government and the UK public sector.

Shopper calculating the cost of groceries

Fuel and travel costs are pushing prices up again

Thursday 5 November 2026

Inflation has risen to 3.1%, meaning everyday spending is getting more expensive just as household budgets are already under pressure.

Shopper calculating the cost of groceries

Mortgage relief will have to wait a little longer

Wednesday 4 November 2026

Interest rates are staying at 3.75%, so households with mortgages and other borrowing may have to wait longer for costs to come down.

Shopper calculating the cost of groceries

Energy bills are going up as winter approaches

Wednesday 4 November 2026

A higher energy price cap means many households will be paying more to heat and power their homes during the colder months.

Preview
Let's work together

Get in touch

We're looking to work with individuals and organisations who can contribute funding, expertise, data, technology, or strategic connections to help build better economic tools and research.

General Enquiry