Fuel and travel costs are pushing prices up again
Thursday 5 November 2026
Inflation has risen to 3.1%, meaning everyday spending is getting more expensive just as household budgets are already under pressure.
Wealth has not simply become more concentrated at the top, but rising asset values have widened the gap between people who already own wealth and people trying to build it.
The main official source is a survey of households in Great Britain. Its latest results cover April 2020 to March 2022, so figures on this page are for Great Britain and that period unless stated. [1]
The survey counts four kinds of wealth. These are their shares of the total. [1]
The value of homes and other property, minus any mortgage.
The value of workplace and personal pensions built up so far. The state pension is not counted.
Money in the bank, shares and other investments, minus debts such as loans and credit cards.
Vehicles, household contents and valuables.
Someone can have a high income and little wealth, like a well-paid young renter. Someone else can have a low income and a lot of wealth, like a pensioner who owns a valuable house. The two overlap, but wealth inequality is much greater than income inequality.
A share is the slice of all wealth held by a group, such as the top 10%. A gap is the difference in pounds between one group and another. If everyone's wealth doubles, the shares stay the same but the gaps double.
Both things have happened in Britain. Shares have been broadly stable and the gaps have grown. [2] Much of the argument about wealth comes down to which of the two you think matters more.
No single number captures it, so it helps to look at several.
The wealthiest 1% of households held 10% of all household wealth. That was the same as the least wealthy 50% of households combined. [1]
The wealthiest tenth held 41%. [5]
To be in the wealthiest 10%, a household needed £1,200,500 or more, pensions included. For the top 1% it was £3,121,500.
The household in the middle had £293,700. The least wealthy tenth had £16,500 or less. [1]
Statisticians use the Gini coefficient to score inequality from 0 (everyone has the same) to 1 (complete inequality). Wealth scores 0.59. Income after direct taxes scores 0.36. Savings and investments are the most unevenly spread kind of wealth, at 0.87. [1]
The gap in average wealth per adult between families in the top tenth and families in the middle was £1.3 million in 2020–22. In 2006–08 it was £1.0 million in real terms. [2]
That is 52 years of typical full-time earnings, up from 38. [3]
The household in the middle had £10,400 in savings and investments after debts. For households that rent it was £900. For households whose head was neither working nor retired it was £300. [1]
Surveys struggle to reach the richest households. A 2021 study that added data from the Sunday Times Rich List estimated that nearly £800 billion held by the very wealthiest was missing from the official figures. [6]
The 2026 Rich List counted 157 billionaires in the UK. [7]
A caution about the numbers. The official results are more than four years old and were collected during the pandemic. In June 2025 the survey's status as accredited official statistics was suspended while the Office for National Statistics works to improve its quality. [1]
Hannah and Joe are both 35. They trained as teachers together, work at the same school and earn the same salary.
Neither has done anything wrong, and neither works harder than the other. But Hannah has tens of thousands of pounds in her home and Joe has a few thousand in the bank. The difference isn't what they earn. It's what they started with.
There is no single cause. These are the explanations that come up most often.
In the mid-1980s, total household wealth was around three times the size of the UK economy. [2] By 2019 it was around seven times. [10]
When wealth is large compared with pay, the same shares mean bigger gaps in pounds. It takes more years of earnings to catch up, so saving from a salary counts for less and what you already own counts for more.
Homes, shares and pension funds rose in value over several decades. A Bank of England staff paper found that the rise in house prices relative to incomes between 1985 and 2018 could be more than accounted for by the long decline in real interest rates (interest rates after inflation). [11] From 2009 the Bank's bond-buying programme, known as quantitative easing, pushed asset prices up further. [12]
When prices rise, the gains go to people who already own assets, in proportion to how much they own. People who own nothing gain nothing.
The Resolution Foundation estimates that rising asset prices, not new saving, accounted for 60% of the rise in average family wealth between 2018–20 and 2020–22 [2], and for 53% of the rise since the start of the 2010s. [3]
The Bank of England said in 2012 that the top 5% of households held 40% of the financial assets, outside pensions, whose value its programme had boosted. It also judged that without the programme most people in the UK would have been worse off, because the economy would have been weaker. [12]
Property is the largest part of household wealth. Older households who own may have benefited from rising house prices over their lifetime, while only 5% of renters have any property wealth at all. [1]
A mortgage turns monthly housing costs into an asset. Rent does not. So two households with the same income can end up with very different wealth.
The typical household that owned its home outright had wealth of £647,400. For those with a mortgage it was £404,700. For those who rented it was £40,800. [1]
Inheritances have been growing as a share of national income in the UK since the 1970s. [4] As older generations' wealth has grown, so has the amount they can pass on.
An inheritance depends on who your parents are, not on what you do. The more it counts for, the more a person's prospects are shaped by the family they were born into.
For people born in the 1980s, the Institute for Fiscal Studies projects that inheritances will add 29% to lifetime income for those whose parents are in the wealthiest fifth, and 5% for those whose parents are in the least wealthy fifth. [4] A fifth are expected to inherit less than £10,000, and a quarter more than £280,000. [13]
One complication: measured against their own lifetime income, high and low earners are projected to inherit similar proportions, around 16% and 15%. [4] So inheritance divides people more by family background than by earnings.
Between the 2008 financial crisis and the pandemic, the wealth gap between younger and older people widened. [10] In 2020–22 the typical household headed by someone aged 65 to 74 had £502,500. That was 33 times as much as one headed by someone aged 16 to 24. [1]
Some of this is normal. Older people have had longer to save. The worry is whether today's young adults will catch up when they reach the same age.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies found that people born in the 1980s had built up no more wealth than those born a decade earlier had at the same age, even though their parents were wealthier. [13]
The fall in wealth since 2021 has narrowed the gap between young and old. But a lot of wealth remains with older households, and will pass down through inheritances and gifts. [10]
These are the groups with the least wealth. Figures are medians, meaning the household in the middle of each group.
Households that rent had typical wealth of £40,800, against £647,400 for those who own outright. Their typical savings, after debts, were £900. [1]
Households headed by someone aged 16 to 24 had typical wealth of £15,200. Those headed by someone aged 25 to 34 had typical savings, after debts, of £1,300. [1]
Where the head of the household was neither working nor retired, for example through illness, caring or unemployment, typical wealth was £25,200. [1]
Typical household wealth in the North East was £179,900. In the South East it was £489,800, more than twice as much. [1]
Households headed by someone of white ethnicity were four times as likely to have wealth above £500,000 as households headed by someone of black African ethnicity, according to researchers using the official survey. [8]
A fifth of people born in the 1980s are expected to inherit less than £10,000. A quarter are expected to inherit more than £280,000. [13]
Few people argue that wealth should be spread equally. The harder questions are how much wealth concentration is too much, and what could be done without harming people who have simply saved for a home and a pension.
Property and pensions make up three-quarters of household wealth on the official measure [1], and 80% on the Resolution Foundation's. The Foundation warns that higher taxes on wealth would be likely to fall on pensioners and homeowners in the south of England, or their families, and not only on the super-rich. [3]
There are two different routes. One is to focus only on the very largest fortunes, which is the idea behind an Extreme Wealth Line. The other is to help people with few assets to build some, mainly through home ownership and pension saving.
Much of the growth in wealth came from asset prices rising as interest rates fell. [11] The Bank of England sets interest rates to control inflation, not to manage who owns what. Its own assessment is that its bond-buying raised asset prices, but that most people would have been worse off without it. [12]
Leave interest rates to do their job, and deal with the effects on wealth through other policies such as tax. Higher interest rates since 2021 have already reversed part of the rise. [10]
Most parents want to help their children, and inheritances are projected to grow. [4] But the more they count for, the more they favour people whose parents are wealthy.
This is mainly a question of how inheritances and gifts are taxed, which the tax page covers. The Institute for Fiscal Studies adds a caution: bigger inheritances do not by themselves tell us whether inheritance is making inequality worse. That depends on who receives them, and when. [13]
The figures above are mostly agreed. What they add up to is not.
Wealth in Britain is very unevenly spread, far more so than income. The wealthiest 1% of households hold as much as the least wealthy half.
But the title of this page needs care. On the best available data, the share held by those at the top has been broadly stable since the 1980s, and is far lower than it was a century ago. What has changed is the size of the pile. Wealth has grown much faster than pay, so the gaps in pounds are wider, harder to cross by working and saving, and more dependent on inheritance.
The real disagreement is about how much of this reflects ordinary saving for a home and a pension, and how much it matters when the gaps grow but the shares don't. It is also about what we can't see: the official figures are dated and miss wealth at the very top. For one option, see Exploring an Extreme Wealth Line.
These sources support the facts and examples on this page. They explain the evidence, but they don't all share the same view of how serious the problem is or what should be done about it.
Keep in the loop
Highlights from about the UK economy, the UK government and the UK public sector.
Thursday 5 November 2026
Inflation has risen to 3.1%, meaning everyday spending is getting more expensive just as household budgets are already under pressure.
Wednesday 4 November 2026
Interest rates are staying at 3.75%, so households with mortgages and other borrowing may have to wait longer for costs to come down.
Wednesday 4 November 2026
A higher energy price cap means many households will be paying more to heat and power their homes during the colder months.
Guides and insights
Clear, accessible analysis of the economic issues shaping everyday life
Living standards
Comparing the cost of everyday life across generations, from bread and beer to buying a home.
Food & prices
How farming, energy, transport and supermarket competition shape the price on the shelf.
Prices & inflation
What slower price rises mean for wages, purchasing power and economic recovery.
Shared prosperity
Beyond GDP: how we could measure economic success through security, opportunity and living standards.
We're looking to work with individuals and organisations who can contribute funding, expertise, data, technology, or strategic connections to help build better economic tools and research.